Skip to content

News & Insights

USCIS New Policy Regarding Application Denials Begins Today: Update

USCIS’ new policy of initiating removal proceedings against anyone whose application is denied and that denial leaves the applicant out of status goes into effect today.  In a stakeholder meeting September 27th USCIS addressed a number of concerns.

Phase-In of the New Policy

The policy will be phased in,and will not immediately apply to employment-based petitions or cases of humanitarian relief.  Forms I-129 and I-601A will not be included in this initial implementation.  It will apply to applications for permanent residence (adjustment of status) and to other applications to extend/change non-immigrant status.

Removal (formerly deportation) proceedings begin with the issuance of a Notice to Appear (NTA), and a foreign national is officially in removal proceedings when ICE files the NTA with the immigration court.

At the September 27th meeting USCIS stated it generally will wait for the statutory period of time to file a motion to reopen/reconsider or appeal to expire prior to issuing the NTA, although they reserve the right to issue the NTA at any time.

If a motion or appeal is still pending when an NTA is issued, and later the motion or appeal is granted, USCIS will work with ICE to advise them of the favorable action in the case.  Note, however, at that point the favorable action in itself has no impact on the removal proceedings.

What Happens if an Appeal or Motion to Reopen or Reconsider is Granted?

If the appeal is granted, and the grant puts the applicant back in lawful status, the applicant’s lawyer must make a motion to the court to terminate the removal proceedings based on the fact that the applicant is in lawful status.

If the motion to USCIS to reopen or reconsider the original application is granted, then the person still isn’t back in lawful status.  Upon reopening or reconsideration, the application could still be denied.  In that instance, in the past the court was more likely to grant a continuance to wait for the final decision by USCIS, or to administratively close the case, an action that removes the case from the active docket, but allows either the applicant or the government to move the court to re-calendar it at a later date.

However, under new rules established by the attorney general in the past few months, immigration judges have quotas of cases to be completed, and their ability to administratively close (hold in abeyance) or continue a case is now notably curtailed.  Attorneys must carefully evaluate and draft the motion to the court to comply with the new rules on continuances, administrative closures, and terminations.

An Immigration Officer’s Decision Not to Issue an NTA will be Reviewed

USCIS stated that it will consider any positive and negative factors apparent in the record prior to deciding to issue an NTA.  Each office will create a panel consisting of a supervisory officer and an ICE attorney to review whether to issue the NTA.  Note (!) the panel will only review the case when a decision not to issue an NTA was recommended by the officer.  That would mean if the initial immigration officer recommends an NTA be issued, then, it will be issued.

Leaving the Country Prior to Issuance of the NTA—Verification of Departure

USCIS stated at the stakeholder meeting that it will provide adequate notice for the applicant to leave the country prior to issuing the NTA.  Note here that if an applicant should decide to leave (which should be decided only after a detailed review with an experienced attorney) it will be critical to follow procedures to validate the departure.  If the departure is not validated, USCIS will not know about it, and is likely to issue an NTA despite the person having already left the country.  There could be serious consequences in the future such as an in absentia removal order if the person doesn’t attend a hearing.

Finally, note that the new NTA policy does not replace or change prior existing policies regarding issuance of NTA’s by USCIS.  Rather, it expands the situations in which USCIS will issue an NTA.


This article is for general information only. It does not constitute legal advice for any specific situation, nor does it create an attorney/client relationship.
Back to News & Insights

Our Attorneys


Our Paralegals

Our Professional Staff

Payton Baespflug Payton Baespflug Billing Specialist
Tiah N. Branson Tiah N. Branson Firm Administrator
Cloe Chin Cloe Chin Front Desk / Admin Assistant
Lia Cho Lia Cho Finance Manager
Sam J. Milton Sam J. Milton Operations Coord.
Ivania C. Ordonez Ivania C. Ordonez Legal Assistant

By selecting the “Pay Bill Online” link, you will be able to pay your PRK Livengood invoice by credit card or debit card.  You will leave our website and be directed to CardX for payment processing.  CardX is a secure platform and does not collect or store any credit/debit card information.

Please be aware that CardX will apply a 3.5% processing fee for credit card payments, but no fee for debit cards.

Our online payment service is for existing clients ONLY.  If a payment cannot be matched to an existing account, we will reject the charge.  If you are attempting to make a payment and have questions or concerns about this payment service, please contact our office at 425-462-4700.

Pay Bill Online